Gladman’s Original Proposal vs Gladman’s Current Proposal - What’s changed?
When Gladman first approached local residents, they presented plans that have now changed. Now that the formal planning application is in, we can clearly see just how much has changed – and not for the better.
Key Differences and Concerns:
Loss of Green Space: The current proposal shows significantly more encroachment into the surrounding natural area than originally implied.
Loss of Hedgerow: Important ecological corridors and mature hedgerows are now set to be removed; these were not clearly marked or acknowledged in the initial documents.
Proximity to St Helen’s Church Community Garden: The proposed development now pushes uncomfortably close to this valuable community space, impacting views, usage, and tranquillity.
These are not minor adjustments – this is a far more invasive development than residents were originally shown.
Who Are These Homes Really For?
As campaigner Yvette rightly pointed out, this development is clearly aimed at bringing in new residents, rather than addressing local housing needs. Gladman’s own Socio-Economic Statement states:
‘The delivery of up to 65 homes is likely to be home to a total of 138 new residents.’
‘Assuming that 61.8% of the population is of working age…the delivery of 65 homes could result in an additional 85 people of working age residing in Hastings.’
This is not about helping Hastings residents. It’s about increasing numbers, not meeting need.
What Happened to the Affordable Homes?
Originally, 16 homes were described as ‘affordable.’ But now? There’s a clear lack of transparency on how many of these homes will genuinely be affordable, who will qualify, and how this will help local families.
Bottom Line:
The current plan is not what was promised, and it comes at great cost to a cherished green space, biodiversity, and community character. We're urging all residents to object clearly and strongly – we want no development on this site.